To blog or not to blog...that is the
question. I have been on the side of not blogging so far, because
blogging requires commitment and concentration, and no one would read
it anyway. It's a lot of work with no clear reward. I have found more
satisfaction in situations where I know that “my voice will be
heard”, like entering in the middle of someone's facebook argument.
It's a nomadic, somewhat irresponsible mode of social behavior. I can
enter into another person's worldview, criticize it from the inside,
and leave at my own convenience – or when I'm kicked out. I
criticize, but leaves very little revealed for my intellectual host
to criticize in turn. There is an advantage to being a small target:
I risk little harm to my philosophy and ego, while maintaining an
offensive debating position. But the disadvantage to these gorilla
tactics is that they can only attack; they cannot defend. As I grow
up and become more involved in the world, I find that there are
political, philosophical, and religious positions that I want to
defend. In order to defend them, I must present them, to the best of
my ability, as an option or possible target to my peers. This means
putting some work into building an intellectual castle, where (if
anyone reads it) I can entertain the thoughts of my peers and develop
my own opinions through civilized discussion. So I invite the world
(or what tiny portion of the world that knows me) to enter into Der
Holzburg. More coming when I
decide what to write about first...
Ah! I found you! Eagerly waiting for your first post!
ReplyDelete